Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Neil Wilson's avatar

The conclusion of my 'Why the Bank of England Act 1998 has no effect (on government spending)' section in a talk I gave yesterday was that this is fundamentally a constitutional question. Can an unelected set of Bank officials really say no to Parliamentary approval of supply?

The UK legislation states that the monetary policy objectives are 'price stability' and 'support the economy policy of the government'. The Treasury then gets to define, by order, what those two terms mean and change them at any time.

So if MMTers were in charge we'd just define price stability as £100 of central bank money for delivery in a year's time costs £100 today.

Job done.

It's all smoke and mirrors. I doubt anybody at the sharp end in finance believes the 'independence' concept, if they ever did.

Expand full comment
eg's avatar

My casual observations regarding central banks (both their legal status and their behaviours) leads me to conclude that they aren't "independent" in any ordinary sense of the word -- that seems to me to be more of a slogan than any actual existing thing; sort of like "free trade."

Expand full comment
3 more comments...

No posts